What movement reacted against the inhuman aspects of the International Style?

Postmodernism is recognized as a movement that reacted against the International Style, which was characterized by its minimalism, functionalism, and lack of ornamentation. While the International Style prioritized form over function and the aesthetic appeal was often secondary to structural integrity, many architects and theorists felt that this approach ignored the context of buildings, the needs of their users, and the historical and cultural elements of architecture.

Postmodernism emerged in the late 20th century as a response to these perceived limitations, emphasizing diversity, individuality, and historical reference. It incorporated stylistic eclecticism, allowing for a blend of different styles and materials to create buildings that resonated with local cultures and environments. This movement sought to highlight the human experience within architecture, advocating for designs that were more relatable and contextually appropriate, in contrast to the impersonal nature of the International Style.

In this way, Postmodernism not only critiqued the formal attributes of the International Style but also aimed to reintroduce meaning, symbolism, and emotional engagement within architectural practice.