Which approach perceives the human mind as a computer in relation to aesthetics?

The information theory approach perceives the human mind as a computer in relation to aesthetics because it draws analogies between human cognition and computational processes. This perspective suggests that our understanding of aesthetics can be analyzed similarly to how information is processed by a computer. It focuses on how information is received, transformed, and interpreted by individuals, paralleling the functional operations of a computer system.

In this context, aesthetics is not merely a subjective experience but can also be reflected through quantifiable measures of information and understanding. This approach allows for a systematic analysis of how humans engage with art and design, treating aesthetic experiences as data to be processed rather than solely emotional reactions.

Formist, psychobiological, and behavior setting approaches have different focuses. Formist approaches prioritize formal elements of design over cognitive processes. The psychobiological approach examines human responses from a biological or psychological perspective rather than through computational metaphors. Conversely, the behavior setting approach focuses on the interaction between individuals and their environment without directly linking it to information processing in the way that the information theory does. Each approach offers valuable insights into aesthetics, but the information theory approach distinctly aligns with the idea of the mind functioning like a computer.